President Hollande has finally called the Paris attacks what they really are - an act of war.
It is inane to characterise these and similar attacks as mere acts of terror or the acts of religious extremists. ISIS has grown into a state that both operates within a physical, geographical domain in the Middle East, but also through the aid of the internet, a warped Caliphate whose tentacles reach around the world.
We should not dismiss ISIS as a mere terrorist organisation.
Whilst it may be comforting to paint this war in purely Manichean terms - ISIS is evil and thus its enemy must be good - like in all wars, things are rarely morally black and white.
The US, Europe and their allies have been in denial that their foreign policy in the Middle East have spun out of control. Aiding and abetting the destabilisation of the Middle East during the ‘Arab Spring’, the invasion of Iraq, and the toppling of the Middle Eastern strongmen they called dictators have not ushered in an era of peaceful, liberated democracy that Western naive ideologues believe it would.
Instead, what has filled the void has been something far worse.
It is also terribly naive for the Western powers to believe that airstrikes and drone attacks are all they need to do to destroy ISIS.
Today, this has been driven home in the most terrible of ways that whilst air strikes may reduce casualties amongst Western soldiers, war can also be brought into the heart of their own cities.
What do you expect in war? You bomb their cities, their people, and they are not going to find a way to exact vengeance on you?
That is the nature of war - it is cruel, vindictive and innocents suffer for the power games that their rulers play.
If the Western Allies have finally woken up to the fact that they are not merely fighting a terrorist organisation but fighting a war, then they have two options.
One, surrender and stop their half baked and failed interventions in the Middle East.
Two, stop pussying around, quieten the soft, liberal segments that plague all Western democracies and end what they helped start by committing resources and unfortunately, the lives of their soldiers to destroying their enemy.
An enemy that has shown today that they will do whatever is in their means to fight back.
Unfortunately, the rest of the world has also been dragged into this war and Singapore is no exception.
There are a few things that we must do, things that Western societies, hogtied by naive liberal ideas have shied away from doing.
Firstly, freedom of speech must not be extended to hate speech.
During the Charlie Hebdo attacks I saw that some Singaporeans, whose brains have been befuddled by the same disease that Western liberals suffer from, expressed solidarity with the comic book authors who spread hate speech.
In Singapore, we must stand fast and unwavering in banning extremist speech that exploit religious, racial and foreigner-local fault lines.
Those that do not listen must be punished harshly, and jailed with no compunction.
Secondly, we must not in the misbeliefs of human rights activists shy away from detaining without trial those that want to commit violence against us, and those that want to join our enemies.
Real freedom is founded on the security for the majority, and if the freedom of our enemies and those that want to do us harm must be taken away, and the keys thrown away forever, so be it.
In the coming days, we will hear people asking for understanding, and serving us platitudes about values, freedom and culture.
In war, there is only one value. Either you survive, or your enemy survives.
And in order to survive, in order to protect the lives of Singaporeans, our Government must be ruthlessly strong, and mercilessly tough.
And we the citizens of Singapore, must stand shoulder to shoulder and support our Government in this.
Dear Calvin, I fully agree with you. In life, nothing is free. Freedom of speech, especially if it affects other peoples' visceral feelings and beliefs, can expect to incur a cost. People who are in no position to impose economic sanctions or other costs on their opponents, will resort to asymmetric low intensity acts of war. So yes, we need to get off the high horses and walk the talk.
ReplyDelete